[Primer] Boros Burn
Moderators: Kaitscralt, zemanjaski, Christen
-
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1182
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:45 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
Was running some tests with a friend with the naya planeswalker monsters version and Boros Reckoner was causing him fits. Does the non jund version just have to hope that that can gore-clan rampager over it or mortars it early or is this just a case of "don't play anything but Jund monsters if you are going GRx midrange"?
I'm selfishly asking so that I can try and kill more monsters or green devotion decks with burn, of course.
I'm selfishly asking so that I can try and kill more monsters or green devotion decks with burn, of course.
- BlakLanner
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1173
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 3:51 am
- Location: Lancaster, NY
Against the general meta, Jund is better than Naya due to the extra removal. However, if you are expecting a lot of Jund (which is on the decline), Naya is a good call since Elspeth causes Jund all kinds of problems if you live long enough to deploy it. Against Reckoner, they either have to Rampager or Banishing Light it to beat it.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/XuLF4aE.jpg)
DCI Rules Advisor
MTGO/Cockatrice: BlakLanner
My YouTube Channel
BlakLanner is the boogeyman created to scare the little Standard players.
Currently Playing
- Valdarith
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 5169
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Southeast AL
GR has to Mortars it or trample over it with Ghor-Clan. No other option really unless you count flying over the top with Stormbreath Dragon. Fighting with Domri isn't exactly optimal but I've done it a few times and it never feels good.Was running some tests with a friend with the naya planeswalker monsters version and Boros Reckoner was causing him fits. Does the non jund version just have to hope that that can gore-clan rampager over it or mortars it early or is this just a case of "don't play anything but Jund monsters if you are going GRx midrange"?
I'm selfishly asking so that I can try and kill more monsters or green devotion decks with burn, of course.
![Image](http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y265/tylerw53/val_zps1a761ee9.jpg)
Check out my stream! http://www.twitch.tv/valdarith
-
- Regular Member
- Posts: 206
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:24 pm
- BrainsickHater
- Regular Member
- Posts: 325
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:41 pm
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
- LaZerBurn
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1143
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:21 am
- Location: Edinburgh UK
If I was too play a standard MOCS tomorrow this is the list I'll run:
[deck=MDU's Rw Burn]Lands 23
8 Mountain
4 Sacred Foundry
4 Temple of Triumph
3 Mutavault
2 Boros Guildgate
1 Temple of Silence
1 Mana Confluence
Creatures 08
4 Young Pyromancer
4 Chandra's Phoenix
Enchantments and Removal 05
4 Chained to the Rocks
1 Mizzium Mortars
Burns 24
4 Magma Jet
4 Warleader's Helix
4 Shock
4 Skullcrack
4 Boros Charm
4 Lightning Strike
Sideboard 15
4 Toil // Trouble
3 Mizzium Mortars
2 Banishing Light
2 Chandra, Pyromaster
2 Assemble the Legion
1 Mutavault
1 Reprisal[/deck]
Why Assemble the legions? Its still the I-WIN button vs Bx Devo (which is the most common Bx Devo list)
Why 3 Mizzium Mortars? Its the most simple answer
for Ux Devo and other aggro builds
Why 4th vaults? Good vs control and when you want too control
![(^-^)b :smileup:](./images/smilies/smileup.gif)
![:-) :)](./images/smilies/smile.gif)
![Image](http://i930.photobucket.com/albums/ad150/endlessupkeep/lazerburn2_zps4bf9220c.jpg)
Thanks to NerdBoyWonder for the awesome sig ![:-) :)](./images/smilies/smile.gif)
![:-) :)](./images/smilies/smile.gif)
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
It is a really good card.Hivemind. That's why.
And as someone who has repeatedly messaged me for sideboarding advice, critiquing other players for deferring to a better players understanding of strategy is a bit lame.
![Image](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c353/jamesfazzolari/zem1_zps45567c7e.jpg)
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- dpaine88
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 920
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2013 2:16 am
Blah...all I can think about is how I stole a game 1 vs Reid Duke then lost games 2 and 3. I was 5-0 at that time.
I feel like I punted so bad...hopefully you guys can clear it up for me.
I am at a decent life total, like 18 or 20.
I have:
Lightning Strike in hand
tons of lands(flooding)but have mutavault.
2(then 3) Phoenix's
1 Young Pyro
3(then 4) Young Pyro tokens
He has:
Jace
Frostburn Weird
4 lands
1or 2 card in hand
13 Life
He plays the Jace and ticks up Jace. I lightning Strike it EOT. Then I attack with my 2 Phoenix and kill it.
He plays a 2nd Jace and ticks up. I draw another Phoenix and attack Jace.
He plays Tidebinder and taps my Phoenix.
I draw more land and attack and kill Jace.
He plays yet another Jace and ticks up. I get Jace to 1.
My memory is a little foggy here but basically he had Jace 3 turns in a row and then killed me with a big Master and I just drew nothing
really.
If I had just attacked him each time, he might have been dead. But maybe he would have -2 Jace then played the other and Ticked up and then played stuff and won so who knows...
I just wanted to get a turn where I could attack with all my tokens, YP and Mutavault so I just kept killing Jace.
I figured whats the chance he draws ALL THREE of the copies he runs in the sideboard- basically in a Row...
I feel like I punted so bad...hopefully you guys can clear it up for me.
I am at a decent life total, like 18 or 20.
I have:
Lightning Strike in hand
tons of lands(flooding)but have mutavault.
2(then 3) Phoenix's
1 Young Pyro
3(then 4) Young Pyro tokens
He has:
Jace
Frostburn Weird
4 lands
1or 2 card in hand
13 Life
He plays the Jace and ticks up Jace. I lightning Strike it EOT. Then I attack with my 2 Phoenix and kill it.
He plays a 2nd Jace and ticks up. I draw another Phoenix and attack Jace.
He plays Tidebinder and taps my Phoenix.
I draw more land and attack and kill Jace.
He plays yet another Jace and ticks up. I get Jace to 1.
My memory is a little foggy here but basically he had Jace 3 turns in a row and then killed me with a big Master and I just drew nothing
really.
If I had just attacked him each time, he might have been dead. But maybe he would have -2 Jace then played the other and Ticked up and then played stuff and won so who knows...
I just wanted to get a turn where I could attack with all my tokens, YP and Mutavault so I just kept killing Jace.
I figured whats the chance he draws ALL THREE of the copies he runs in the sideboard- basically in a Row...
Burn baby burn!
- LP, of the Fires
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4857
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:06 am
If you don't kill jace, you have a 5 turn clock barring him drawing fliers/domesticatins/master of waves outracing you so given those odds, I'd have killed at least the first jace and revaluated from there. When he moves on to playing second jace and locking down one of your birds, then you have to start thinking about attacking him and hoping to draw gas.
You gotta understand, I love the beatdown. I really do. I always have.
Beatdown is hard, though.
Patrick chapin
Beatdown is hard, though.
Patrick chapin
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
You must of thought I meant the word hivemind meant "cause zeman does it". I meant that most of us tend to run very similar lists until we find a reason for changing it drastically (ie: not running reckoner but still running flamespeaker). If twice = repeatedly, then you really need to reevaluate your understanding of the english language. Please,It is a really good card.Hivemind. That's why.
And as someone who has repeatedly messaged me for sideboarding advice, critiquing other players for deferring to a better players understanding of strategy is a bit lame.
get your head out of your ass.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/OlQyflf.jpg)
yurp yurp
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
- BrainsickHater
- Regular Member
- Posts: 325
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:41 pm
Lately I haven't been able to play much magic and I've been consistently doing poorly at FNMs. I hope it's just my lack of play-time and me screwing up that's causing my losses.
The last two times I've gone to FNM, they were really small and I played against the same guy playing a Bant Sphinx's Rev deck, and I just couldn't quite beat it. The first day I played it I threw too much burn at planeswalkers and didn't have enough to close out the game, G2 I won very handily, and G3 I lost when my opponent mulled to 5 (so embarassing). I put a lot of eggs into Chandra and Flamespeaker, thinking that my Boros Charm would protect them. But the only "destroy" removal in his deck was Supreme Verdict, which I pretty much knew. For some stupid reason I took that line anyway and lost when he killed the threats I was banking on and drew some more lands.
Later that day I lost to a Jund Constellation deck (GB
Constellation splashing R for Rakdos' Return). The only game I really remember was Game 3, where I had him on the ropes and then he Returned me for 3, emptying my hand after I responded with burn (I did so because that let me use two spells as opposed to the one I would be left with in my 4-card hand). I eventually drew into a Chandra and things were going well until a Doomwake Giant hit the battlefield. I was pressured to either end the game (with 6 points of damage) or find removal, fearing a Strength From the Fallen. I drew Boros Charm and revealed Chandra's Phoenix, and I went for the kill without noticing the 3 mana my opponent had up. He responded to my Boros Charm with the Crypt Incursion I knew he had boarded in and gained 15 life. He did have Strength from the Fallen as well, but I'm fairly certain that if I had slow-rolled the Boros Charm I would have won that game.
The second FNM I went to recently, I again lost to the Bant player. Game 1 I won handily, Game 2 I lost to triple Courser
beats + not drawing efficient removal. Game 3 I lost by not having the 1 point of damage needed to kill him before he swung for lethal next turn. The two things that stuck out to me that kept me from having that point of damage were the following:
1. Not Skullcracking a Courser trigger (in case he had revelation)
2. Boarding in Flamespeaker. Against most UWx decks Flamespeaker is solid, but against the deck that plays Courser + Caryatid + Advent of the Wurm it's a tad awkward. For some reason I hadn't realized this across 2 matches and 6 games.
The next match I lost was to mono-blue. Game 1 my opponent had Master and I had no answer, Game 2 I couldn't draw a white source to answer the master she played with my Banishing Light. She followed it up with another master tho, so I guess it wasn't very relevant. I'm really hating Monoblue, it feels like 85% of the games are decided by whether or not I have an answer for my opponent's masters.
My boarding for monoblue (with the Yasooka build)
is as follows: -4 Skullcrack, -4 Boros Charm, +1 MM, +2 Banishing Light, +3 Flamespeaker, +1 W//T, +1 Chandra
I am considering changing it to: -4 Shock, -4 Skullcrack, -4 Boros Charm, +4 Boros Reckoner, +3 Flamespeaker, +1 MM, +1 W//T, +1 Chandra, +2 Banishing Light
But I'm unsure if this is correct as Shock feels decently strong in the matchup.
Dunno why I made this post, mostly just raging at myself and have to vent a little.
The last two times I've gone to FNM, they were really small and I played against the same guy playing a Bant Sphinx's Rev deck, and I just couldn't quite beat it. The first day I played it I threw too much burn at planeswalkers and didn't have enough to close out the game, G2 I won very handily, and G3 I lost when my opponent mulled to 5 (so embarassing). I put a lot of eggs into Chandra and Flamespeaker, thinking that my Boros Charm would protect them. But the only "destroy" removal in his deck was Supreme Verdict, which I pretty much knew. For some stupid reason I took that line anyway and lost when he killed the threats I was banking on and drew some more lands.
Later that day I lost to a Jund Constellation deck (GB
Constellation splashing R for Rakdos' Return). The only game I really remember was Game 3, where I had him on the ropes and then he Returned me for 3, emptying my hand after I responded with burn (I did so because that let me use two spells as opposed to the one I would be left with in my 4-card hand). I eventually drew into a Chandra and things were going well until a Doomwake Giant hit the battlefield. I was pressured to either end the game (with 6 points of damage) or find removal, fearing a Strength From the Fallen. I drew Boros Charm and revealed Chandra's Phoenix, and I went for the kill without noticing the 3 mana my opponent had up. He responded to my Boros Charm with the Crypt Incursion I knew he had boarded in and gained 15 life. He did have Strength from the Fallen as well, but I'm fairly certain that if I had slow-rolled the Boros Charm I would have won that game.
The second FNM I went to recently, I again lost to the Bant player. Game 1 I won handily, Game 2 I lost to triple Courser
beats + not drawing efficient removal. Game 3 I lost by not having the 1 point of damage needed to kill him before he swung for lethal next turn. The two things that stuck out to me that kept me from having that point of damage were the following:
1. Not Skullcracking a Courser trigger (in case he had revelation)
2. Boarding in Flamespeaker. Against most UWx decks Flamespeaker is solid, but against the deck that plays Courser + Caryatid + Advent of the Wurm it's a tad awkward. For some reason I hadn't realized this across 2 matches and 6 games.
The next match I lost was to mono-blue. Game 1 my opponent had Master and I had no answer, Game 2 I couldn't draw a white source to answer the master she played with my Banishing Light. She followed it up with another master tho, so I guess it wasn't very relevant. I'm really hating Monoblue, it feels like 85% of the games are decided by whether or not I have an answer for my opponent's masters.
My boarding for monoblue (with the Yasooka build)
is as follows: -4 Skullcrack, -4 Boros Charm, +1 MM, +2 Banishing Light, +3 Flamespeaker, +1 W//T, +1 Chandra
I am considering changing it to: -4 Shock, -4 Skullcrack, -4 Boros Charm, +4 Boros Reckoner, +3 Flamespeaker, +1 MM, +1 W//T, +1 Chandra, +2 Banishing Light
But I'm unsure if this is correct as Shock feels decently strong in the matchup.
Dunno why I made this post, mostly just raging at myself and have to vent a little.
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Between Facebook, private messages and public requests it's a lot more than twice.You must of thought I meant the word hivemind meant "cause zeman does it". I meant that most of us tend to run very similar lists until we find a reason for changing it drastically (ie: notIt is a really good card.Hivemind. That's why.
And as someone who has repeatedly messaged me for sideboarding advice, critiquing other players for deferring to a better players understanding of strategy is a bit lame.
running reckoner but still running flamespeaker). If twice = repeatedly, then you really need to reevaluate your understanding of the english language. Please, get your head out of your ass.
And I know exactly what hivemind means, there was no suggestion it had anything to do with me. I certainly didn't think to add the card to the board. Someone is feeling very insecure today it would seem.
You've become awfully precious since I stopped spoon feeding you information.
![Image](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c353/jamesfazzolari/zem1_zps45567c7e.jpg)
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Despite my many flaws, I still help people and have contributions and achievements far in excess of yours. I'm not a good person, but I'm a damn good magic player. You went sour when you branched off to do your own thing and I wouldn't endorse your choices; I can respect a need for validation and affirmation from one's peers but you're basically acting like you're being persecuted.
You'll find existence a lot happier if you just accept that I'm not nice and that I don't give sideboard advice.
You'll find existence a lot happier if you just accept that I'm not nice and that I don't give sideboard advice.
![Image](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c353/jamesfazzolari/zem1_zps45567c7e.jpg)
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
- LP, of the Fires
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4857
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:06 am
-
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1182
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:45 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
It is pretty obvious he was referring to Shouta, not himself, and honestly, I took the same impression of your posts whenever this topic comes up. However, I don't know the group that well though so I can't tell if you're being sincere and I'm misreading it or if you actually are shooting between a mix of dismissiveness and passive aggressiveness.You must of thought I meant the word hivemind meant "cause zeman does it". I meant that most of us tend to run very similar lists until we find a reason for changing it drastically (ie: notIt is a really good card.Hivemind. That's why.
And as someone who has repeatedly messaged me for sideboarding advice, critiquing other players for deferring to a better players understanding of strategy is a bit lame.
running reckoner but still running flamespeaker). If twice = repeatedly, then you really need to reevaluate your understanding of the english language. Please, get your head out of your ass.
So, yeah.
- Tyrael
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 774
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:01 pm
- Location: Antwerp, Belgium
-
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 1182
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Tue Sep 17, 2013 7:45 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
So anyway, back to the topic of setting people on fire. I agree with Purp that cutting shock is a bad idea when it kills 12 guys, particularly judge's familiar which is aggravating. Plus YP tokens are at their best here. Also, if you are on the flamespeaker plan, you really want shock to punch through all their guys.
Fuck auto correct on this phone is annoying.
Fuck auto correct on this phone is annoying.
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Shock plus Mortars are tried and tested and very effective. Mortars in particular offer excellent synergy with YP and disrupt their curve with mana parity, also let you save Chains/Light for Master AND win at six mana (though counters complicate that).
Probably want at least three mortars in the 75, maybe 4.
I'd also echo MDU's advice to go back to assembke; straight MBC is back in force and it's the most brutal card for that matchup.
Probably want at least three mortars in the 75, maybe 4.
I'd also echo MDU's advice to go back to assembke; straight MBC is back in force and it's the most brutal card for that matchup.
![Image](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c353/jamesfazzolari/zem1_zps45567c7e.jpg)
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
Searing Blood is pretty lame;
- only kills what shock does at twice the price
- doesn't find you relevant cards like jet
So it's only upside is in racing, but that's hard when it can't kill Weird or Specter. I mean, it's totally fine, but it's the weakest 2 damage spell in the matchup IMO. Play more mortars it does everything you need. You may be able to find room for a Soark Trooper if you're not on 4 'vault.
I think Reckoner can leave the SB now too; mono black and mono u in ascendency means monsters will decline now. That should free up a lot of space. Ill crunch some numbers later.
- only kills what shock does at twice the price
- doesn't find you relevant cards like jet
So it's only upside is in racing, but that's hard when it can't kill Weird or Specter. I mean, it's totally fine, but it's the weakest 2 damage spell in the matchup IMO. Play more mortars it does everything you need. You may be able to find room for a Soark Trooper if you're not on 4 'vault.
I think Reckoner can leave the SB now too; mono black and mono u in ascendency means monsters will decline now. That should free up a lot of space. Ill crunch some numbers later.
![Image](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c353/jamesfazzolari/zem1_zps45567c7e.jpg)
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
Players at my LGS play 4 negate and 3-4 rapid hybridization. -4 Skullcrack -4 Boros Charm (+1 BC -1WLH) +2 BL +3 Flamespeaker +3 Mortars did not do it for me my past two paper matches vs U.
Last edited by Purp on Tue Jul 08, 2014 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
![Image](http://i.imgur.com/OlQyflf.jpg)
yurp yurp
- Purp
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 2063
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 5:06 pm
- LP, of the Fires
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4857
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:06 am
Well, if you just want to win that particular matchup, play firedancer.
You can also try not bringing in flamespeaker and leaving in boros charm. Having more 4 damage spells makes it a LOT easier to assemble 20 points of lethal.
You can also try not bringing in flamespeaker and leaving in boros charm. Having more 4 damage spells makes it a LOT easier to assemble 20 points of lethal.
You gotta understand, I love the beatdown. I really do. I always have.
Beatdown is hard, though.
Patrick chapin
Beatdown is hard, though.
Patrick chapin
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
This was funny.My feelings are far from hurt, it's the internet.
Also people ask for pictures with me at events, I'm obviously the biggest deal around.
![Image](http://i31.photobucket.com/albums/c353/jamesfazzolari/zem1_zps45567c7e.jpg)
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Bona fide hustler making my name
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
[quote="[url=viewtopic.php?p=241952#p241952:3f4526eb]zemanjaski » Mon Jul 07, 2014 7:13 pm[/url:3f4526eb]":3f4526eb]Despite my many flaws, I still help people and have contributions and achievements far in excess of yours. I'm not a good person, but I'm a damn good magic player. You went sour when you branched off to do your own thing and I wouldn't endorse your choices; I can respect a need for validation and affirmation from one's peers but you're basically acting like you're being persecuted.
You'll find existence a lot happier if you just accept that I'm not nice and that I don't give sideboard advice.[/quote:3f4526eb]
I still believe you're a good person Z, but you have your flaws just like everyone else. I still believe you're a fundamentally good person though, even when you come off like you aren't.
You'll find existence a lot happier if you just accept that I'm not nice and that I don't give sideboard advice.[/quote:3f4526eb]
I still believe you're a good person Z, but you have your flaws just like everyone else. I still believe you're a fundamentally good person though, even when you come off like you aren't.
- Rhyno
- Regular Member
- Posts: 167
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:52 pm
-
- Newcomer
- Posts: 27
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 1:47 pm
- zemanjaski
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 11348
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 2:26 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
- Contact:
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Rhyno
- Regular Member
- Posts: 167
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2014 9:52 pm
- LP, of the Fires
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4857
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 4:06 am
- Lightning_Dolt
- Tire Aficionado
- Posts: 4739
(View: POSTS_VIEWTOPIC /POSTS_VIEWTOPIC_INTO) - Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2013 5:51 am
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests