WePick Mafia 2.0 - DAY 1
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2015 11:39 pm
Ok Manders. After that big post I am comfortable enough to say I was wrong.
unvote
unvote
Another Dead MTG Board
http://community.ist.utl.pt/
Uh...a lot? I'm pretty sure I'd never played with rednihilist before last game. And, if I did, it would have been at least a year ago.Manders, how much do you trust yourself to hunt scum without meta?
I am SO still watching you.Ok Manders. After that big post I am comfortable enough to say I was wrong.
unvote
You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.
What do you think he was trying to do?You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.
I dont understand your thought process here stardust.
Also, hunt responded to manders.
You're not even trying. Extremely uncharacteristic for you.Heh, what do you mean? I've never been much for early Day 1 analysis. I'll get on it soon enough.
How many people had responded before you changed your mind? Don't go check, off the top of your head.10How many people are in this game, Huntzilla?
Jesus Christ, use quotes.Why the claim talk?
Mtgs meta is claim happy right now, wanted to test waters and see where we stood. Your flat out no statement killed any other reactions I might get because everyone follows you like a bunch of puppies around here.
Literally shits and gigs. I think it's bullshit you thought I was scum at that point in the game. Liar.
I'm up to like 8 games, all on MTGS.
I'd kill Kpaca now that I know it is him. That makes the mod vote that much more worse in my eyes. Maybe you depending on where you go with this "I knew hunt was scum" lie you are rolling with.
MTGS is full of lazy people who don't want to WORK to win the game. No claims. (I miss the good 'ol days )
Everyone follows me like a bunch of puppies? Provide examples from this game.
You can think it's bullshit all you want. Who did you think I was referring to?
Your reaction to the revelation has been very telling.
Vote: Huntzilla
How does it being kpaca make the mod vote worse? (Nice OMGUS at the end there, though.
I dont know what he was trying to do, thats why im asking. That way, we can refer to it later if necessary.What do you think he was trying to do?You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.
I dont understand your thought process here stardust.
Also, hunt responded to manders.
And did he? Lemme check, I'm pretty sure I asked a follow-up question.
Oh ok. I see what you're getting at.he responded to post 52 in post 62, however poorly. Stardust said he would see how hunt responded in post 58.
The post you just quoted him not responding to is your post #63.
Not that you didnt follow up, but he did respond.
You have no theories? I'd like you to share them before Stardust posts again if you do.I dont know what he was trying to do, thats why im asking. That way, we can refer to it later if necessary.What do you think he was trying to do?You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.
I dont understand your thought process here stardust.
Also, hunt responded to manders.
And did he? Lemme check, I'm pretty sure I asked a follow-up question.
Post 52?Ok Manders. After that big post I am comfortable enough to say I was wrong.
unvote
None of it, from kpaca's vote to Stardust's, is nonsense, but I'll leave it be for now.I have an idea or two, but im not going to post them until im satisfied with his explanations and maybe not even then.
But trying to start a wagon or get a reaction from kpaca with that post is nonsense.
Hunter was voting him too. It's not that I was trying to get a wagon going on kpaca. The image of there being a wagon gives information on choices that other players make. Do they join the kpaca wagon? Do they vote somewhere else? Do they question my vote, or do they ignore it? All that stuff makes a vote on kpaca more valuable than a simple unvote.You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.
I dont understand your thought process here stardust.
I know. I don't have time right now to get into that. I haven't even read Manders' big post in detail yet.Also, hunt responded to manders.
So there are 5 people with 1 vote on them and you vote for kpaca.Hunter was voting him too. It's not that I was trying to get a wagon going on kpaca. The image of there being a wagon gives information on choices that other players make. Do they join the kpaca wagon? Do they vote somewhere else? Do they question my vote, or do they ignore it? All that stuff makes a vote on kpaca more valuable than a simple unvote.You were hoping to get a wagon going on kpaca with one naked vote?Nothing in particular. Pretty much what I listed above.
I dont understand your thought process here stardust.
I know. I don't have time right now to get into that. I haven't even read Manders' big post in detail yet.Also, hunt responded to manders.
I didn't know where we sat on the votecount, but Hunter voting for kpaca was meaningful since Hunter himself was under scrutiny. If Manders was correct that Hunter was scum, me making his vote more legitimate does give more information on other players. And, yes, kpaca can't be arsed to do much he doesn't want to do, but he does react to votes as much as the next guy, sometimes in an over-the-top angry kind of way.So there are 5 people with 1 vote on them and you vote for kpaca.
I get it i think. It just doesnt seem sound to me.I didn't know where we sat on the votecount, but Hunter voting for kpaca was meaningful since Hunter himself was under scrutiny. If Manders was correct that Hunter was scum, me making his vote more legitimate does give more information on other players. And, yes, kpaca can't be arsed to do much he doesn't want to do, but he does react to votes as much as the next guy, sometimes in an over-the-top angry kind of way.So there are 5 people with 1 vote on them and you vote for kpaca.
What should I have done with my vote instead, in your opinion?
You and Tordeck. 2... mwa ha ha...How many people had responded before you changed your mind? Don't go check, off the top of your head.
I can't provide examples from this game for the puppy comment... But I can point out the number of votes you garnered for no reason. That points to people centering around you to feel you out, which in turn will allow them to sheep you later should you "pan out" as town to them.Jesus Christ, use quotes.
MTGS is full of lazy people who don't want to WORK to win the game. No claims. (I miss the good 'ol days )
Everyone follows me like a bunch of puppies? Provide examples from this game.
You can think it's bullshit all you want. Who did you think I was referring to?
Your reaction to the revelation has been very telling.
Vote: Huntzilla
How does it being kpaca make the mod vote worse? (Nice OMGUS at the end there, though.
I didn't vote for him when I was under scrutiny. I voted for him for RVS for the "mod vote tell." What are you getting at with that first sentence, because it makes no freaking sense?I didn't know where we sat on the votecount, but Hunter voting for kpaca was meaningful since Hunter himself was under scrutiny. If Manders was correct that Hunter was scum, me making his vote more legitimate does give more information on other players. And, yes, kpaca can't be arsed to do much he doesn't want to do, but he does react to votes as much as the next guy, sometimes in an over-the-top angry kind of way.So there are 5 people with 1 vote on them and you vote for kpaca.
What should I have done with my vote instead, in your opinion?
Hi. Yes. See post 92vote stardust
His line of thinking just makes no sense.
Have you ever played with kpaca or read games he was in? If so, how much?You and Tordeck. 2... mwa ha ha...How many people had responded before you changed your mind? Don't go check, off the top of your head.
It was also just a suggestion. I was not dead set on doing so, otherwise I would have started off with my claim.
I can't provide examples from this game for the puppy comment... But I can point out the number of votes you garnered for no reason. That points to people centering around you to feel you out, which in turn will allow them to sheep you later should you "pan out" as town to them.Jesus Christ, use quotes.
MTGS is full of lazy people who don't want to WORK to win the game. No claims. (I miss the good 'ol days )
Everyone follows me like a bunch of puppies? Provide examples from this game.
You can think it's bullshit all you want. Who did you think I was referring to?
Your reaction to the revelation has been very telling.
Vote: Huntzilla
How does it being kpaca make the mod vote worse? (Nice OMGUS at the end there, though.
I actually figured you had meant Tordeck.
Kpaca should know better than to make mod votes... it is an old RVS tell that always gets called out.
Thanks! I mean I tempered the OMGUS a little by just saying I WOULD kill you. Not that I thought you were scum. Because I don't think you are, I think you're just wrong.
If I was scum would I do this!!
unvote:
Vote: huntzilla vote: huntzilla
[/quote]Votecount 1.2
Ham (1): RedNihilist
Stardust (2): Tordeck, Ham
Mojo (1): Huntzilla, Stardust
Manders (1): Pedrobear
Huntzilla (3): Manders, MoJo, MoJo
Not voting: rezombad, ( G_R )
Pretty sure that's right. With 10 alive, it's 6 to lynch.
I have only played with him twice recently (both ongoing and he replaced out, which was sad), and read a few games on here that I mentioned with him in it, and maybe one other with him on MTGS.Have you ever played with kpaca or read games he was in? If so, how much?
Why didn't you just say so.If I was scum would I do this!!
unvote:
Vote: huntzilla vote: huntzilla
So given that you know it was kpaca who voted the mod, and have seen that he has a confirmed double vote, why do you think he is scum?Why didn't you just say so.If I was scum would I do this!!
unvote:
Vote: huntzilla vote: huntzilla
unvote Mojo