Dies to Removal

Ximbad or bust!

Did we win?

Wait, there's only one dead scum. Of course we didn't.

Reason for vote?

Wow, this game is still going on.

If the game isn't over, Manders is scum.

why would the game be over we only have one dead scum so far

Good thing Phantom lied and I have an extra shot in case we fucked toDay up. :afoot:

Unvote Manders. Vote Ximbad

If Ximbad is scum, then I was wrong about you and am sorry.

If he's not, people should listen to me more often, but I already knew that.

If the game isn't over, Manders is scum.

You should back THAT statement up, bub.

Good thing Phantom lied
and I have an extra shot in case we fucked toDay up. :afoot:

Learn the emoticons.

So if Ximbad is scum, you're saying Sep's the last one?

Yup.

I mean it COULD still be Guardian, but I don't see him doing that at this point in the game. ("That" being hammering his buddy without saying a word about anyone else.)

It's the only way he'd survive the next Day. /shrug

Eh, like I said, he COULD still be scum, but my gut says I'm right.

How about you tell us why you're so sure Sep/Jones is not scum?

He actually had good reasons for pushing Yanni early. And it didn't read at all to me like Seasons.

Jones had good reasons for pushing Yanni?

That's what you're saying?

Because I don't remember him posting reasons. I'll refresh my memory.

Yes, he did.

votes for manders or ximbad are good things

Yanni posted this while he was the hot ticket.

We may have made a mistake, but his placement of myself before Ximbad may be intentional.

Yes, he did.

No worries. I'm concluding this myself.

1: Votes everyone.
2: "I don't like the cut of your jib" to Guardian.
3: Votes Guardian for making jokes.
4: States he dislikes Yanni's "overreactions to RVS" post. PhantomS stated it first.
5: Random remark about PhantomS' playstyle.
6: States he hates claiming.
7: States he selectively hates emoticons.
8: "Theres a difference between short posting amd short, useless posting."
9: Points out a short, useless post I made.
10: States Yanni's worried about defending his "inane drivel."
11: Tells Guardian to vote me.
12: Tells Khaddafi to hope for the best on Day 1.
13: Votes Yanni for defending his RVS randomness.
14: Tells Yanni he's defending his RVS "through text."
15: States votes on me are bad because you have to have a vagina to read me properly. (False statement, btw. Doesn't matter if you have a penis or not.)
16: Scoffs at Yanni's &
quot;content."
17: More scoffing.
18: "And Im voting yanni because his only content comes in the form of content he is clearly fabricating as a defense to something. Not a thing he is saying isnt trying to throw up a cloud of dust so he can make his escape. Im sure you may think I'm voting him for sucking in rvs, but thats not true. I'm voting him for being a scum who happens to also suck at rvs."
Ok, so he did provide a reason. One that he was not the first to state or vote for.
19: Defends his playstyle.
20: More defending of me.
21: Tells Guardian how to change skins.
22: Snide remark @ Yanni.
23: States he's questioning Guardians reasons for voting me, not whether he has reasons or not.
24: Subtle defending of PhantomS.
25: Scoffs at me voting for Khadaffi.
26: Calls for more votes on Yanni.
27: "Yanni has yet to even dignify his scuminess with a response that isnt akin to "laffo". Ergo he is scum."
28: States his votes has been on Yanni "like the
whole time."
29:

is imopen2 really asking people to give him reads?

This is the best yanni has right now folks. Think on it.

30: Questions Yanni's defense.
31: Refuses to participate in T/S lists.
32: Vote hops to Khadaffi with no reason listed and having never said anything about him.
33: "Possible equation:

Col. Khaddafi+Yanni+x=scum team.

I need to solve for x and work out a proof to make sure I'm right though."
34: "Shimmy shimmy yah" at me voting for Khadaffi.
35: "He doesnt have to but ill laser blast him if he doesnt" in response to "so Col. K is at 4 votes right now. if he
gets 5 does that mean he has to claim?" - Implies he's a vig, which we now know he is not.
36: "Well either Yanni or Scumbag is scum and I say we test with Yanni.

unvote: vote yanni"
37: "Oh wait nvm this is easy, i glossed over Scumbag claim to quick.

I'm Finn, hes lying.

unvote: vote col khaddafi"
His decision to go for Yanni before Khadaffi makes me feel better about him.
38: Tells Khadaffi he's not Finn and asks who he is.
39: Asks Khadaffi why he's lying. Valid question since we now know Khadaffi was lying about everything in his claim.
40: "Suggesting im scum for counter claiming you doesnt even make sense."
41: "Are you dead?

Why did you lie?"
Continued concern with why Khadaffi lied. What bothers me is I get the feeling he KNEW Khadaffi lied as town. Like, seriously, if he truly thought Khadaffi was scum, why is he so confused as to why he lied?

TL:DR
The only thing Jones stated as to why Yanni was scum was his defense of
random posting, but here's the thing. As I said D1, that's stuff Yanni would do regardless of alignment. It worked out that Jones was right this time, but was he right, or was he bussing? His ease with switching to Khadaffi, then providing what I feel to be forced confusion at Khadaffi's lying, make me think he's scum.

Day 2 post analysis incoming.

1: States he's not participating in T/S lists.
2: States he can't justify Khadaffi's actions.
3:

T/S lists in Popcorn sounds fine to me.

also wtf scumbag

Seriously?

unvote: Vote Yanni

4:

[quote="PhantomS » Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:59 pm&
quot;]

T/S lists in Popcorn sounds fine to me.

also wtf scumbag

Seriously?

unvote: Vote Yanni

You are going to need to elaborate on this for very obvious reasons.

Well he just jumped on the two quickest protown things he saw without any original (that is to say, his idea first) content, which is quite clearly just a way to force the ruse of activity.

More interesting in conjunction of this:

You didn't see any night actions did you? Even if Yanni was roleblocked (which he will undoubtably now say he is), he would have said that in his first post. However, considering he isn't
really the watcher/tracker/whatever he said he was, he forgot that if he were a watcher/tracker he would be expected to do that.

ergo, Yanni is lying and scum.[/quote]
Provided Yanni with an /out. I mean, not like he provided a highly innovative one, but he did nonetheless.
5: States he hopes Yanni is dead from my accidental lynching.

Yeah, none of this counters my logic regarding his confusion over Khadaffi. He showed that he genuinely knew Khadaffi was town without realizing he did so, and we all glossed over it.

To answer your question, i really didn't care the order of my pairing. The alternative was to try and convince all of you manders was scum, which it seemed like a lot of wasted effort.

Iso: shoot either me or Manders. I think that breaks the game for town, if you don't outright pick correctly...

Why are you directing the vig? Iso's pretty good at this game, you know...

I'll probably be shooting Guardian. Pew pew. Better get me tonight! 8]

Wrong question Manders. The correct question is: Why would i not tell him to shoot you/seppel, if i am really town...

I'll probably be shooting Guardian. Pew pew. Better get me tonight! 8]

The suspense is killing me-°______°-

I'll probably be shooting Guardian. Pew pew. Better get me tonight! 8]

Hey. You. What about my logical reasoning for Jones being scum?

pew pew

As the only confirmed town, trying to act somewhat helpful and responsive might not be a horrible idea =/.

"I like my rationale for why he's town better"

As the only confirmed town, trying to act somewhat helpful and responsive might not be a horrible idea =/.

No, it's really not necessary at all. Think about it.

Iso. Is confirmed Town.

I mean, it'd be nice to know his thoughts, but it is in no way necessary. I'm absolutely content trusting his instincts. The question of Jones/Seps can wait until Tomorrow.

Being confirmed town =/= being correct. Or will you trust his instincts if he decides you're the last scum? =0.

The only reason I want him to shoot me is because if I am wrong and Seppel is the last scum, I don't think I can convince him I am not scum. Shooting Seppel would be funny though, as if he flips town, you will do a complete 360. =p

So she'd change her opinion to what it currently is?

But yeah, I'm going to kill you toNight. Don'tchoo worry 'bout a thang.

Being confirmed town =/= being correct. Or will you trust his instincts if he decides you're the last scum? =0.

The only reason I want him to shoot me is because if I am wrong and Seppel is the last scum, I don't think I can convince him I am not scum. Shooting Seppel would be funny though, as if he flips town, you will do a complete 360. =p

Ugh, you make my head hurt.

So you no longer feel I am the last scum, then? When did that change from me to you?

And I've been pretty honest about not being sure if you or Seps are the last scum. Of course, IF Ximbad's scum. If he's not, we're boned. And not in a good way.

Nah, I've got this.

You started out the day as hard on: GUARDIAN IS THE LAST SCUM!!!

You then tried to convince Iso that Kpaca/Seppel might have been wrong doing the complete 180. I said it would be funny as hell watching you complete the 360 by going after me, if Seppel gets shot and flips town.

And you definitly were sure, because almost every post was: "I am sure you are scum, unless Jones is completely fooling me".

I hope that's directed at Manders?

Yes, I have been saying that. Your own "quote", however, shows that I've never been 100% positive that you're scum. I've always acknowledged Jones/Seps COULD be scum. Now, I happen to have located what I believe to be evidence supporting that theory.

I don't understand why you'll enjoy watching me turn back onto you (which I'm not completely off of you atm, btw) when I've said all along Jones COULD be scum, and so could you.