How can it be said that we're in a hurry to end the day if nobody has even voted?
The claiming isn't to end the day, it's to give us things to work on for the day, because either you're the typical cryptic say something but don't say everything hope I don't get lynched or you have information that benefits the town.
Answer my fucking question, goddammit.
In fact, here. Let me do some of the work I promised to do.
Here, this post shows it all:
I'm not going to assume Yanni is scum because he didn't claim outright. That's just being entirely too presumptuous.
like why the fuck are you guys willing to lynch the town investigative role like what the actual fuck
A watcher sees who their target targets.
You lied about your role.
Goddamn you, Yanni.
Vote: Yanni
nLike, seriously. This is inconsistent as all get out.
How is it inconsistent?
Situation one, Yanni didn't claim right away. Any number of reasons for that to happen, both from a Town perspective and a Scum perspective.
Situation two, Yanni was caught in a lie. While I don't enroll in LaL, lying REALLY is not a Town trait and should be suspected.
My only fault was voting so quickly, which turned out fine in the end, so meh.
As you can see, my first post is stating that I'm not going to presume Yanni is scum because he didn't claim outright. If you click the link that goes to that original post, you can see that I'm referring, not to his role claim, but his night action claim.
My second post is voting Yanni for lying about his role.
PhantomS uses these two posts as a platform for an accusation of "being inconsistent." Now, inconsistency
is a pretty good scumtell because it usually means someone is making the shit up as
they go along. However, anyone with half a brain can see that the subjects of these two posts are completely unrelated.
So, my question is, why did PhantomS use this information? Luckily for me, when I was searching for this post, I saw something else that caught my eye:
Well guys, I kind of screwed the pooch on this one. I am the Flame Princess and I was a one-shot vig (town, obviously). Last night I targeted Captain Murphy because the entire game he seemed to be very passively guiding the conversation. There's not much else I can say than that I fucked up on this one.
Yesterday went by really quickly but I think some things of value can be gathered. For starters, we need to hear from EVERYBODY today. No exceptions.
Off the top of my head I would think that yesterday's lynch makes a very strong case for Kpaca being town (
though he's a crafty devil. I'll never say 100% on him)and Mander's bringing the hammer down so loosely makes me rather suspicious of her going for the lynch on a scum buddy so as to appear town. IIRC she was dismissive of day one's Yanni wagon. Need to reread some stuff, but I'm going to start things off today with a vote: Manders.
I thought back, and couldn't remember him ever having said anything about CM before this, so I checked:
Post 33: FoS Captain Murphy
Post 59: Post his reads thus far. There is no mention of Captain Murphy.
Post 60: Correction: he did comment on CM in 59, though it was a wishy-washy statement.
Post 84: Addresses CM; not indicative of read.
Post 104: Addresses CM; not indicative of read.
Post 167: Addresses CM; not indicative of read.
Post 168: Addresses CM; not indicative of read.
Post 180: Addresses CM; not indicative of read.
Post 285: Addresses CM; not indicative of read.
End of Day 1: He spent much of the day
voting and pushing for a Yanni lynch. He was voting for Scumbag at the end of the day. I get a bussing twinge when I re-read day 1.
Not CM related, but relevant; I stated that I was going to re-read teefo and see if I could see a reason he was killed. In post 413, he tells me that he just did, and was left more confused as to why teef was killed. Throwing me off the trail of something good? I'll have to re-read teef to find out.
End of Day 2: Not one comment on CM at all. He spent the entire day pushing for Yanni's lynch.
Nothing. There's nothing in here to show that he had any concerns about CM being scum.
This coupled with his weak attacks on me and his, what I feel is, blatant bussing of Yanni lead me to decide where to go next.
Vote: PhantomS
@manders: you
didn't bring up any new information in your last post. The only new info is the fact that you'll claim last, but only if everyone wants you to. Nearly everyone wants you to claim.
I don't plan to trust that you don't need to claim.
Of course I didn't bring up new information. I was answering questions I'd been asked before.
I did this time, though. Like I promised I'd try to do. What do you think of it?
Jackass.
Manders,
What in any of your gaming experience at salvation makes you think this cryptic claiming in mis-lynch or lose is a good idea? We are one simple misstep away from losing. Doesn't matter if the mafia knows your a PR or not, especially since you have been implying that you have been getting
roleblocked recently (after all, if someone is targeting you and your the last PR, it doesn't take a smart guy to put 2 and 2 together.
What makes you think it's mislynch or lose?
And the reason this is a good idea is because I'm town. Do you disagree?
6 alive with 2 mafia. Simple math is your friend here.
Oh, wait, ok, here's why you think that.
So, there's 6 alive now, right?
Assuming there's 2 mafia, that leaves 4 town.
We lynch town and it's 3 town, 2 mafia.
Tonight, they kill a townie. That leave 2 town, 2 mafia.
While that situation would, indeed, be terrible, that would not be game over. Since the scum win condition is not in the OP, I have to assume it is the standard "You win when you control the lynch/outnumber the town." Neither of those is the case
with 2 town, 2 mafia.
So, tell me again why it's mislynch or lose?
I still think manders claims and we lynch the guardian.
Why do you think I need to claim, Jones?