Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:50 pm
^^ Galspanic will read my post, nod, then block it out of his memory forever.
Page 10 of 11
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:56 pm
I heard mention of tugees and tug'ems
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:57 pm
Nothing says "We accomplished something" like talking about how much we accomplished.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:01 pm
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:01 pm
passive aggression is still aggression
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:02 pm
my close friend's uncle is the voice of the map and swiper.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:03 pm
sprouting doggie doors with our little pup
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:10 pm
I like Dora the Explorer.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:10 pm
Isa the Iguana.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:11 pm
Benny the Bull.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:11 pm
Not to mention her adorable sidekick, Boots.
Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2013 11:25 pm
I'll take the 250 post compromise. I think Scumbag is right that a lot of people may be having a hard time remembering back to how long it takes most people to reach that number of posts, but we can revisit that number later if necessary (IE, when people start making CI threads about how dumb the 250 post limit is.)
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:53 am
Ximbad an teefo can't trade yet.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:53 am
*and
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:55 am
They're probably rippers anyways
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:58 am
what do you have against rippers? 
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:51 am
Haven't you ever heard the fable of Ripunzel?
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:52 am
A heroic prince came to save her and she stole his Goyf collection!
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:02 am
Obviously a fairy tale. Nobody has a playset of 'Goyfs.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:03 am
I like how the turning point seems to have been me going super-trolzer.Nothing says "We accomplished something" like talking about how much we accomplished.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:05 am
Probably some kind of morality tale in that. Hmm.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:08 am
I actually like how the general flow of this thread was:
"Hey look, legitimate problem"
"Let's discuss possible policy"
"We disagree strongly!!!"
Have a light internet fight
"Everything's OK"
"I miss a very specific pair of boobs"
At least a page solid of boob-related discussion
"We did it!"
I'll admit to some definite entertainment value.
"Hey look, legitimate problem"
"Let's discuss possible policy"
"We disagree strongly!!!"
Have a light internet fight
"Everything's OK"
"I miss a very specific pair of boobs"
At least a page solid of boob-related discussion
"We did it!"
I'll admit to some definite entertainment value.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:16 am
This one was masterfully done, btw. A definite high point for the thread.It's a skin suit
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:17 am
does having a foil set and 2 non-foil sets also not meet this requirement?Obviously a fairy tale. Nobody has a playset of 'Goyfs.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:33 am
All this proves is that you are highly unlikely to exist.does having a foil set and 2 non-foil sets also not meet this requirement?Obviously a fairy tale. Nobody has a playset of 'Goyfs.
...
Unfortunate really.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:41 am
I am a very powerful wizard.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 3:47 am
Not helping your argument.I am a very powerful wizard.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 7:22 am
there were enough asses in this thread to make up for the lack of boobs
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:35 am
#madbragzdoes having a foil set and 2 non-foil sets also not meet this requirement?Obviously a fairy tale. Nobody has a playset of 'Goyfs.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 4:47 pm
I'm a fan of 250 posts + time limit. Shit, I'd say even a month is reasonable.
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:52 pm
Best summary ever.I actually like how the general flow of this thread was:
"Hey look, legitimate problem"
"Let's discuss possible policy"
"We disagree strongly!!!"
Have a light internet fight
"Everything's OK"
"I miss a very specific pair of boobs"
At least a page solid of boob-related discussion
"We did it!"
I'll admit to some definite entertainment value.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 3:16 am
ONE last thing to throw on the table and if I could throw it truly I would make sure it was bloody:
Are we doing OUR own way?5.0 Doctrine of Universal Jurisdiction:
Participation in Market Street is a privilege, not a right, of all MTG Salvation members. Therefore, any member that has had their trading privileges revoked from any other site will be considered guilty of bad trade practices on MTG Salvation and have their trading privileges revoked.
Any user whose trading privileges have been revoked under this Doctrine may file an application for privilege restoration with the Market Street staff. All applications will be thoroughly reviewed and all claims investigated. Users who appeal agree to abide by our decision, be it in the affirmative or negative. This decision is final.
Any user caught participating in Market Street3 without valid original4 or restored5 trading privileges will be banned from MTG Salvation permanently.
n3Market Street Cafe and BTRs excluded
4Original trading privilege is defined as a user whose first online trade is conducted through MTG Salvation
5Restored trading privilege is defined as a user whose trading privileges were revoked under this doctrine and subsequently restored by the Market Street Staff.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 8:38 am
Ugh, I hate Universal Jurisdiction (not just for trading or on websites). It's difficult to prove, completely unnecessary, and can (albeit only in rare instances) leave the site open to legal trouble. I always think it's better to just say "we think you're a ripper burden of proof on you."
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 11:36 am
we also do not exist in the same universe as mtgs so universal jurisdiction cannot applyUgh, I hate Universal Jurisdiction (not just for trading or on websites). It's difficult to prove, completely unnecessary, and can (albeit only in rare instances) leave the site open to legal trouble. I always think it's better to just say "we think you're a ripper burden of proof on you."
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 11:38 am
post #10,000 in this forum, suckazzzzz
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 11:38 am
32
10000
10000
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 11:44 am
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 2:08 pm
Funny you should mention that, just yesterday I had a long-ish conversation regarding alternative dimension feedback theory, that not only are there an infinite number ofwe also do not exist in the same universe as mtgs so universal jurisdiction cannot applyUgh, I hate Universal Jurisdiction (not just for trading or on websites). It's difficult to prove, completely unnecessary, and can (albeit only in rare instances) leave the site open to legal trouble. I always think it's better to just say "we think you're a ripper burden of proof on you."
alternative dimensions but that those who most closely resemble their "neighbors" have a quantifiable effect on them. The essential takeaway is that we cannot predict the universe because it isn't ours, and that at any given time there are multiple tiers of reality which overlap each other and switch back and forth as our closest possibilities influence us.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 2:12 pm
For example, at any second we might switch over to a reality where the above isn't just a string of existentialist bullshit.
Posted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 3:20 pm
I dislike the idea too. but my reasons are I seen too many sites mark you cause they didn't like you. So why should you be held to be punished on other sites cause one had a bug up their ass?Ugh, I hate Universal Jurisdiction (not just for trading or on websites). It's difficult to prove, completely unnecessary, and can (albeit only in rare instances) leave the site open to legal trouble. I always think it's better to just say "we think you're a ripper burden of proof on you."