

Moderator: redthirst
": Destroy target orifice."
Yup. When read without making assumptions to compensate for his inability to correctly and effectively use words, "Firedrinker is a sideboard card. This isn't my opinion" means that the purpose of his entire post was to defend a viewpoint and then say he did not agree with the words he had just written.So I honestly don't think this person knows what the definitions of "fact" and "opinion" are.I never mentioned anything about FNM or local meta. I play in large tournaments with 70+ people with several PT regulars.
Why are you people acting like this deck is the best? It's not even close to being #1. There are obviously problems with it. One of them is Firedrinker Satyr.
I'm not arguing based on opinion. I'm arguing based on facts, which is why you guys are getting so upset because you can't refute facts. The fact is, for Firedrinker Satyr to be worth running, he has to get in there 3 times unblocked. Otherwise you are losing more life playing him than you are inflicting with him. That's no bueno.
Against red aggro, red mid-range, red/green, black devotion, and green devotion, he
doesn't get in there 3 times unblocked. Therefore, he's not very good in any of those matchups.
Considering that those decks make up a vast majority of any standard meta, anywhere, that means Firedrinker Satyr isn't good anywhere.
He's good against certain matchups, such as control, but that is what the definition of a sideboard card is. Cards that are good against certain matchups that you bring in to face strictly them.
Firedrinker is a sideboard card. This isn't my opinion.
It's fine. Keep saying stuff like that and we won't have a female to insult.That post wasn't meant to insult our one (?) female in the Clan, however.
redthirst is redthirst, fifth Horseman of the Apocalypse. He was the leader of the Fires of Salvation, the only clan I'm aware of to get modded off the forums so hard they made their own forums.
Degenerate? Sure. Loudmouth? You bet. Law abiding? No ****ing way.
Great guy to have around? Hell yes.
I love the D...
Son, I want you to know that no matter what happens between your mother and me, it's all your fault.
This post by Aes Sedai infuriated me more than anything else I've read on Sally because it was so poorly argued and based on nonsense. She could have just stated, "I don't like to run Firedrinker because I hate playing around its drawback." And that would have been ok. Then she had to try to argue that her reasoning was correct in the most puerile way imaginable.Yup. When read without making assumptions to compensate for his inability to correctly and effectively use words, "Firedrinker is a sideboard card. This isn't my opinion"So I honestly don't think this person knows what the definitions of "fact" and "opinion" are.I never mentioned anything about FNM or local meta. I play in large tournaments with 70+ people with several PT regulars.
Why are you people acting like this deck is the best? It's not even close to being #1. There are obviously problems with it. One of them is Firedrinker Satyr.
I'm not arguing based on opinion. I'm arguing based on facts, which is why you guys are getting so upset because you can't refute facts. The fact is, for Firedrinker Satyr to be worth running, he has to get in there 3 times unblocked. Otherwise you are losing more
life playing him than you are inflicting with him. That's no bueno.
Against red aggro, red mid-range, red/green, black devotion, and green devotion, he doesn't get in there 3 times unblocked. Therefore, he's not very good in any of those matchups.
Considering that those decks make up a vast majority of any standard meta, anywhere, that means Firedrinker Satyr isn't good anywhere.
He's good against certain matchups, such as control, but that is what the definition of a sideboard card is. Cards that are good against certain matchups that you bring in to face strictly them.
Firedrinker is a sideboard card. This isn't my opinion.
means that the purpose of his entire post was to defend a viewpoint and then say he did not agree with the words he had just written.
A fact is something that is true.
An opinion is a personal belief or view.
Aes Sedai's post is composed of lies. They are not opinions and would even be considered a facts if they weren't so damn wrong.
You do need to try to gay it up a little more.
You're like the least gay member of this clan.
And that's counting the fact that you voluntarily have sex with men.
Yeah, but....the problem will fix itself eventually.^ That.It's fine. Keep saying stuff like that and we won't have a female to insult.That post wasn't meant to insult our one (?) female in the Clan, however.
In a pinch, Khaos' beard can help turn this around.
I rarely skip a Khaospawn wall of text because I know there is always piss at the end of the rainbow.
Triton tactics is quietly the best combat trick in standard, and we will see it hit constructed. If you can't hide a 1 mana blow out instant, you don't deserve to suffle up.Anal(ysis of cards) or GTFO
You do need to try to gay it up a little more.
You're like the least gay member of this clan.
And that's counting the fact that you voluntarily have sex with men.
It's a type of ad hominem attack. She can't refute your point, so she attacks your (seeming) inexperience. Her arguments were full of fallacies. I thought it was funny when she tried to claim membership in a philosophical society as proof that she could argue effectively.I love her sense of entitlement. "You've only been here 6 monthes, you don't get to call bullshit on me". Yeah right bitch, I don't care if signed up today, bullshit is bullshit, and you should be embarrassed that someone you think is so new can see through your bullshit. Let her run bad cards, I'll be happy when I get paired against the control deck that stomped her the previous round.
redthirst is redthirst, fifth Horseman of the Apocalypse. He was the leader of the Fires of Salvation, the only clan I'm aware of to get modded off the forums so hard they made their own forums.
Degenerate? Sure. Loudmouth? You bet. Law abiding? No ****ing way.
Great guy to have around? Hell yes.
I love the D...
I found that hilarious. I was a member of the philosophy forum at UMSL and that was in no way a good preparation for any kind of debate, but it was excellent preparation for liver failure.It's a type of ad hominem attack. She can't refute your point, so she attacks your (seeming) inexperience. Her arguments were full of fallacies. I thought it was funny when she tried to claim membership in a philosophical society as proof that she could argue effectively.
You do need to try to gay it up a little more.
You're like the least gay member of this clan.
And that's counting the fact that you voluntarily have sex with men.
He made reasonable points. My brain felt molested.When Kamahl starts calling your analysis daft, you know you've fucked up somewhere down the road of life.
Lol.(S)he isn't a PT player, Sene looked into it.
redthirst is redthirst, fifth Horseman of the Apocalypse. He was the leader of the Fires of Salvation, the only clan I'm aware of to get modded off the forums so hard they made their own forums.
Degenerate? Sure. Loudmouth? You bet. Law abiding? No ****ing way.
Great guy to have around? Hell yes.
I love the D...
You do need to try to gay it up a little more.
You're like the least gay member of this clan.
And that's counting the fact that you voluntarily have sex with men.
Return to “Fires of Salvation”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests