I wasn't having any trouble posting to the thread to begin with, but who knows?

Moderator: redthirst
I think we nailed the final form of Kuroda Boros. It should have much stronger control matchup now.
[deck]Creatures:
4 Ember Swallower
4 Stormbreath Dragon
Planeswalkers:
2 Elspeth, Sun's Champion
2 Chandra, Pyromaster
Other Spells:
4 Chained to the Rocks
4 Lightning Strike
4 Magma Jet
4 Boros Charm
4 Warleader's Helix
2 Mizzium Mortars
Lands:
4 Temple of Triumph
4 Sacred Foundry
4 Boros Guildgate
14 Mountain
Sideboard:
4 Anger of the Gods
4 Assemble the Legion
2 Burning Earth
2 Mizzium Mortars
2 Renounce the Guilds
1 Wear // Tear[/deck]
Consider testing and tuning it when creating your States gauntlet. Not as your potential enemy, more as the kind of deck to run against the meta.
You're oppresive in Aggro matchup, especially
post board.
You're burning out most of control decks actually.
Midrange... well, hope midrange dies to Mortars mostly.
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Everyone's a winner, we're making our fame,1 - Drunk, surly zem
2 - Nice, modest zem
3 - Bragpost zem
4 - Confident and funny zem
5 - Condescending jerk zem
6 - Self-aware zem
Perhaps I'm overthinking it, but does the Competitive section need a "midrange variants" sub to cover the gamut? I know that aggro and control are standing at the peak slugging it out for king of the hill, but I would imagine that someone's going to figure out how to capitalize on BBoV and GhostDad with Tusk/Resto out of the format. If W/B/R can strike the right balance they may get there as well.Figured it would be easier than screwing around with making completely new subforums every couple of months.Sorted now, thanks. Like the restructure.
I'll make one when one of those decks posts relevant results. As of now they haven't.Perhaps I'm overthinking it, but does the Competitive section need a "midrange variants" sub to cover the gamut? I know that aggro and control are standing at the peak slugging it out for king of the hill, but I would imagine that someone's going to figureFigured it would be easier than screwing around with making completely new subforums every couple of months.Sorted now, thanks. Like the restructure.
out how to capitalize on BBoV and GhostDad with Tusk/Resto out of the format. If W/B/R can strike the right balance they may get there as well.
Just to be dickish, who and what determine "relevant" results? One could argue that one SCG Open is not a statistically significant sample size for defining anything as relevant or otherwise.I'll make one when one of those decks posts relevant results. As of now they haven't.Perhaps I'm overthinking it, but does the Competitive section need a "midrange variants" sub to coverFigured it would be easier than screwing around with making completely new subforums every couple of months.Sorted now, thanks. Like the restructure.
the gamut? I know that aggro and control are standing at the peak slugging it out for king of the hill, but I would imagine that someone's going to figure out how to capitalize on BBoV and GhostDad with Tusk/Resto out of the format. If W/B/R can strike the right balance they may get there as well.
Some pro was really impressed with him and nicknamed him "Gyre 'Goyf" I think it was Willy Edel.Gyre Sage is a huge improvement. Good thinking.
The 0/3 plant is terrible in my testing. The thing with a ramp deck is that you have low threat density, so you new a way to convert non-threats into real ones, for example KWR + Solemn beatdown in wolf run ramp. That the plant cannot be converted into a threat, ever, is a huge problem in any non-aggro matchup.
Gyre Sage fixes both issues (ramp and threat).
I don't know how else to answer it? Until the Pro Tour there really isn't anything concrete, but if a midrange deck wasn't even good enough to make a showing at the open, (which you just dismissed as not being worthy of real praise) shouldn't that say something on its own?Granted, but you still didn't answer my question...
G/R Monsters in 3rd, Naya in 7th. Or are you looping "I don't know how else to answer it? Until the Pro Tour there really isn't anything concrete, but if a midrange deck wasn't even good enough to make a showing at the open, (which you just dismissed as not being worthy of real praise) shouldn't that say something on its own?Granted, but you still didn't answer my question...
As for the "who and what," that would be me, and an event large enough to draw professional players. The SCG open did. Many of the best players on the East Coast were there.
Those were ramp decks more than anything. Sledgehammer is piled in with aggro for now.G/R Monsters in 3rd, Naya in 7th. Or are you looping "sledgehammer" creature decks under aggro? I'm good with that, but again I'm just trying to clarify the bounds of what's what.I don't know how else to answer it? Until the Pro Tour there really isn't anything concrete, but if a midrange deck wasn't even good enough to make a showing at the open, (which you just dismissed as not being worthy of real praise) shouldn't that say something on its own?Granted, but you still didn't answer my question...
As for the "who and what," that would be me, and an event large enough to draw professional players.
The SCG open did. Many of the best players on the East Coast were there.
As to "you", my point is made...beware that you don't drift into a Koopa mentality, Alex.
Return to “Fires of Salvation”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests